There was a great article in the Sunday Washington Post magazine by former Post music writer David Segal -- unfortunately titled "Memoirs of a Music Man" -- in which he talks about his time as a music critic and ruminates on what exactly is it that makes us go see music performed live.
It's a good question, especially as we, ahem, grow older and less inclined to work through hangovers and miles of traffic and teenyboppers and dudes in cut-off jean shorts and mullets. Gwydion touched on this in an earlier post, but I think Segal's story really gets to the heart of why some of us are still willing to deal with all of that, and why we were willing to all along, to see a little of the old "rock and roll magic."
Segal starts off with what's wrong (in my mind, at least), with live music today, and that's the fact that so much of it seems no different at all from what you might see on Broadway. He talks about an Aerosmith concert, in which Steven Tyler wowed the crowed by swinging on a trapeze over the first few rows:
It's fair to assume that Tyler rode the same trapeze in the same spot during the same song at every concert that summer, Nissan included. The whole trapeze thing was almost surely dreamed up before the band strummed the first note on the tour. There was probably a trapeze roadie, with instructions that read "9:15, hand Perry an Aquafina. 9:18, go get the trapeze."
That's the way pop concerts are these days, especially large ones. Everything is choreographed, even the parts that seem unchoreographed, and there is no room for unplanned derring-do.
He goes on to say:
I have nothing against musical theater, but when you're expecting a concert, it seems silly and very much against the impulsive, unruly spirit of the genre. Broadway's "Mamma Mia!" never pretends to be free-forming it every night. U2 does, though a U2 concert is essentially the same thing, night after night, right down to the encore.
This is the thing that's driving me crazy lately. Actually, that was the thing that originally drove me crazy. The thing that's driving me crazy now is that nobody seems to care.
Anyway, Segal goes to talk about one of the reasons we should care, and why it is we're willing to deal with all this: what he calls "The great Live Concert Moment."
What's the great concert moment?
(It is) born of something heartfelt and in some important way spontaneous. Not necessarily made up on the spot -- although that's never a bad idea -- but improvised to some degree. You might catch something similar in Boston next week, but it won't be exactly what happened in D.C. This is what sets a great concert apart from a great album. It's about music, but it's also about an experience that's ephemeral and communal, that you share for a couple hours with a bunch of strangers who, at some level, you feel like you know because they have the same idiotic glint in their eye when the lights come up. It's the sense that this whole evening means as much to the band as it does to you. It's great songs multiplied by killer performance multiplied by giddy fan reaction.
I have to admit I've been going to shows for a long time now and I've had only a few of those Great Concert Moments, and some of them definitely include planned, staged stuff that I saw when I was too young to realize it was not exactly spontaneous (most of those involved the hair metal band Kix, so, you know, what can you do).
A few that come to mind:
- Joe Strummer playing a third encore (Redemption Song) that I'm almost sure wasn't planned, since they had turned off the stage power and there were no lights and it was only him and an acoustic guitar standing at the lip of the 9:30 club stage.
- Jerry Garcia playing a Manhattans song in the middle of a typical Dead set (see -- say what you want about the Dead, but at least they could surprise you)
- Tribe Called Quest just walloping the RFK crowd after a flaccid REM set at the first Tibetan Freedom Concert; Red Hot Chili Peppers coming on at the very end of that same show (digging into Pearl Jam's set) as a surprise guest
- The Replacements in the early 90s, clearly hating each other to the extent that my friend leaned over and said "we're watching the last Replacements show ever." We weren't, but they were arguing onstage, and at one point they all just left Paul Westerberg up there, seemingly in disgust. Westerberg played three or four solo acoustic songs, with the highlight being Skyway, and you could have heard a pin drop. They broke up soon after and Westerberg pursued his solo career and we felt like we saw a little, or maybe a big window into that happening, live, onstage.
- The Staples Singers taking the gospel stage at the New Orleans Jazz Festival and all of the sudden feeling like the whole place just got plugged in, like some kind of switch was flipped
That all may sound a little silly and, well, innocent, but I think that's what the Great Rock Moment is all about. What are yours?
That's right -- finally, you can show your support for David Lee Roth as you patiently wait for Eddie and Alex (and the other cat who is not named Van Halen and who really likes Jack Daniels) to come to their senses and reunite with their oldest, bestest frontman. But how can I, a lowly internet citizen, support the high-flying, leg-kicking, midget-palling-around-with, teacher fantasizing, carnival barking, just a gigalo-ing, hair extending David Lee Roth, you might ask? By flying the 
